Church of England failed to protect children from sexual predators, report finds
The Church of England spent decades failing to protect some children and young people from sexual predators, in a bid to protect its own reputation, a damning report has found.
The Church was accused of being “in direct conflict” with its moral purpose by creating a culture where abusers were able to “hide”.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse’s (IICSA) report into the Anglican Church also found examples of clergymen being ordained despite a history of child sexual offences.
Inquiry chairwoman Professor Alexis Jay said: “Over many decades, the Church of England failed to protect children and young people from sexual abusers, instead facilitating a culture where perpetrators could hide and victims faced barriers to disclosure that many could not overcome.”
The inquiry heard that, from the 1940s to 2018, 390 people who were either members of the clergy or in positions of trust associated with the Church had been convicted of sexual offences against children.
The report found that in many of those cases, the Church of England failed to take the abuse seriously, and alleged perpetrators were “given more support than victims, who often faced barriers to reporting (abuse) they simply couldn’t overcome”.
It cites the case of the late Robert Waddington, who was Dean of Manchester Cathedral between 1984 and 1993, and died of cancer in 2007 amid a flurry of abuse allegations dating back more than half a century.
The inquiry heard that a “serious allegation” was made to the then-Archbishop of York David (now Lord) Hope in 1999 about Waddington, but the Archbishop said there was “simply no possibility” of the suspect acting in this way.
The Archbishop was said to have not sought further information, instead meeting with Waddington, who continued to officiate in the Diocese of York.
In December 2004, Archbishop Hope wrote to Waddington stating that he was “very pleased to note the matter is now closed”, the inquiry heard.
The report also refers to the case of Reverend Ian Hughes, from Merseyside, who was convicted in 2014 for downloading 8,000 indecent images of children.
Bishop of Chester Peter Forster, who retired last year, suggested to the inquiry that Hughes had been “misled into viewing child pornography” on the basis that pornography is “so ubiquitously available and viewed”.
Bishop Forster minimised the seriousness of Hughes’ offending, the inquiry found, despite more than 800 of the images being graded at the most serious level of abuse.
The report stated: “In the past, the system of child protection was under-resourced.
“Safeguarding personnel were at times ignored and their advice overlooked, in favour of protecting the reputation of clergy and the Church.”
It said the Church of England also “struggled to develop a model for effective safeguarding within its organisational structure”.
The report acknowledged that the Church had made “considerable improvements to practices and procedures” in recent years, but identified that it needed to make further changes to existing measures.
It also included introducing a Church-wide policy on the funding and provision of support to victims and survivors of child sexual abuse concerning clergy.
The report also identified how the Church in Wales had its own issues, with safeguarding officers “spread too thinly”.
In addition, it had not had its own safeguarding measures independently audited, and there had been very little support for victims and survivors of child sexual abuse, such as counselling and therapy.
In an open letter ahead of the report publication, the Archbishops of Canterbury and York apologised to survivors of abuse, saying they were “truly sorry for the shameful way the Church has acted” against those who have suffered.
Last month, the Church announced it had set up a compensation pot for survivors of historic abuse by members of the clergy, reckoned to cost in the region of £200 million.
The inquiry report follows a previous, linked, strand focusing specifically on shamed bishop Peter Ball, which last year found that the Church of England “put its own reputation above the needs of victims”.
It found that the Church offered secrecy and protection for abusers which allowed them to “hide in plain sight”, and described what could be seen as attempts by the Prince of Wales to support Ball as “misguided”.
Ball, the former Bishop of Lewes and of Gloucester, was jailed in 2015 for sexually abusing 18 young men over three decades.
Charles, who maintained a correspondence with Ball for more than two decades after the bishop accepted a caution in 1992 for gross indecency, told the inquiry he did not realise the truth behind allegations against Ball until his conviction several years later.
Clarence House subsequently said it remained “a matter of deep regret” to the prince that he had been deceived by Ball “over so many years”.
The IICSA was set up in 2015 following claims from a complainant known as “Nick” of a murderous paedophile ring linked to Parliament operating in and around Westminster.
Nick, real name Carl Beech, was later discredited and jailed for 18 years for what a judge called his “cruel and callous” lies.
The inquiry has investigated the actions of celebrities, politicians, police, religious groups and schools, among others.
The remaining three avenues of the inquiry are due to hear evidence later this year, before a final report is laid before Parliament in 2022.
Powered by Translate